Showing posts with label The Butler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Butler. Show all posts

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Why They Weren't Nominated

Taking a look at the movies and people who missed out on nominations.  Not snubs per say, because this post is not about what should have been nominated or movies that I liked more than others.  This is just analyzing some contenders that had Oscar potential and missed out this year.

You can also check out my predictions from last week, I was pretty accurate only missing one or two nominations in m major category.

            
The big upsets for Best Picture were Philomena and Dallas Buyers Club.  Both were late releases and fresher in people's minds.  Philomena was just the type of good movie that people latched on to and supported, despite its lesser amount of box-office or precursor nominations.  Its screenplay most likely helped it out too.  Dallas Buyers Club has two very strong acting nominations which brought it quite a bit of attention.  Its screenplay and editing nomination shows that it was a movie that hit with voters.  Probably a combination of release date, star power, being related to a real issue and campaigning.

The big exclusion was Saving Mr. Banks.  A lot of that may be Disney's inexperience in campaigning, very few movies from Disney or Touchstone have ever received a best picture nomination.  This also did not have a strong enough reception, it is doubtful that many voters placed it at number one.  The lack of a directing contender hurt it too.  But also, as evidenced by Meryl Streep's accusations against Walt Disney last week, Walt is a polarizing figure that people easily latch onto inaccurate rumors about.  The movie did not convince people of the truth and that definitely had a factor in it missing out on best picture, actress, supporting actor, original screenplay and editing.

I probably overestimated Fruitvale Station's chances, but it seemed like the most likely early release.  Early releases did not do well this year, which may be do to none of them receiving astonishing reviews or box-office and the Oscar season being exceptionally strong.  The movie just got forgotten about.  As did The Butler, which had all of the right ingredients for the Oscars but there was enough persistent controversy to keep it down and it may have been released too early.  Also the awkward official title may have something to do with it.  I am still placing the blame for the general absence of Inside Llewyn Davis on CBS Films as a weak, inexperienced distributor.  The movie was also very small among a year of very big films and it just did not stand out enough.

       
My directing predictions were spot on.  Her was not strong enough to get Spike Jonze attention for his direction.  Paul Greengrass certainly had a decent chance after his DGA nomination, but Captain Phillips was not as strong of a contender as many felt.  Ryan Coogler, Lee Daniels and others were not getting in without best picture nominations.

Leonardo DiCaprio made it in, showing that Wolf of Wall Street is a stronger contender this year.  He has been considered snubbed before, which helps.  This is also a career best performance, his role in Great Gatsby helped bring him more attention this year too.  Also Christian Bale was able to ride the hype of American Hustle to a nomination.  His weight gain probably helped.  Both of these performances are broader and flashier than many of the more understated snubs, they were probably just easier to recognize.

The big exclusion was Robert Redford, which was a possibility after missing with SAG.  His film was too small and for whatever reason he has never done well with acting at the Oscars.  Bruce Dern most likely took his veteran slot.  Captain Phillips must have not had enough support, because it missed out in this category too.  The earlier release and potential vote splits with Saving Mr. Banks cost Tom Hanks here.  With The Butler not doing well with voters Forest Whitaker missed out, even with a SAG nomination.  This was a year for established players leaving Michael B. Jordan and Oscar Isaac without much of a chance.  Joaquin Phoenix just did not receive enough attention for Her to be a major contender.

    
This category was always focused on six actresses.  There was little room for other actresses, most notably Adele Exarchopoulos, Brie Larson and Julie Delpy.  Many pundits had left off Amy Adams, but she is too well liked and had too flashy of a role in one of the year's biggest contenders.  I expected that after Meryl Streep won a third Oscar and August: Osage County was poorly received that she would be the one left out.  But the actress is absolutely revered and she had a showy role in an Oscar type movie.  Voters seem to just default to her.

The big snub was Emma Thompson for Saving Mr. Banks.  She is much less popular of an actress than the other nominees which probably factored.  Also her character may have just come across as too unlikable.  But the movie's lack of nominations shows that it just did not work for voters, because it did not get any notable awards and that unfortunately hurt her chances.

               
This was the toughest category to figure out as Jared Leto and Michael Fassbender were the only sure things.  But the voter's love of American Hustle and the likability of Bradley Cooper earned him a nomination many did not think he would receive.  Barkhad Abdi was an unknown actor that just had the right movie and role for him to breakthrough with awards attention.  The amount of fairly consistent precursor nomination most likely put him on voter's radar and definitely paid off for him.  The big surprise however was Jonah Hill who rode the apparent good will for Wolf of Wall Street and has been making good enough career choices to be nominated a second time.

Daniel Bruhl received key precursor notice, but Rush did not and the movie was pretty much shut out. Again, Saving Mr. Banks did not click with voters and Tom Hanks was never the major contender many though he would be for this role.  Posthumous nominations are rare and Enough Said did not get on the voter's radar enough for James Gandolfini to get a nomination.  The buzz about Nebraska being focused on Bruce Dern seems to have harmed Will Forte.  His performance was likely too subtle for this category and he just never quite clicked with precursors for whatever reason.


            
Sally Hawkins was a surprise for Blue Jasmine, which the movie must have been received well enough because she got in in addition to the screenplay.  Jennifer Lawrence was not a sure thing, but American Hustle is just that strong of a nominee to carry four of its actors.  Her career and popularity and buzz about this being a scene stealing revelation also helped.  June Squibb stood out enough as a memorable character in Nebraska.  Julia Roberts and Lupita Nyong'o were locks.

But Oprah was also a lock.  The only main precursor she really missed was the Globes, which is not the most accurate predictor.  It is She may have peaked too early and her return to the screen just ended up being forgotten.  This is the oddest omission, because it is difficult to figure out why she was not nominated.  There must have just been a problem with campaigning The Butler, because the Oscars shut it out.  Also shut out is Fruitvale Station.  Octavia Spencer had too small of a role in a forgotten film and her precursor season did not go far past her National Board of Review win.

Frozen and The Wind Rises were locks and are the two contenders to win animated feature.  The Croods made enough money and was good enough to get a nomination.  Ernest and Celestine played well with the animation industry and GKids has been very good at campaigning small foreign, hand drawn films.  The type of movies that the Oscars should help out.  The surprise animated feature nominee was Despicable Me 2, the first nomination for Illumination Animation.  The incredible box-office most likely was the main factor, but there is a chance that voters are obsessed with irritating little yellow idiots that speak oddly like everyone else seems to be.

The movie that was shockingly left out was Monsters University.  Pixar missed out for Cars 2, but that movie was not good.  The expectation for this to be bad probably factored into it.  People seem to have a backlash for Pixar doing sequels (or in this case prequels) and expect them to be bad.  They were most likely not viewing Monsters as its own movie, but did not like it because it did not feel like a Pixar movie.  However reception was not overly incredible and the movie has not been for everyone.

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Best Picture Predictions

The best picture race is much more open this year than usual.  There are three locks and the rest are really up in the air, especially now that former contenders such as Foxcatcher and Monuments Men got pushed back to 2014.  Former strong candidates such as Rush, Prisoners, Secret Life of Walter Mitty, The Counselor, The Fifth Estate and August: Osage County have dropped out of the race for the most part.  With the Oscar's weird voting process there could be anywhere from five to ten films nominated.  I would assume that there will be nine as there has been in the last two years, but will predict ten since it is still early in the race.

Top Ten Predicted
12 Years a Slave
Pros: Firmly at the frontrunner status with potential nominations and wins in director, adapted screenply, actor, supporting actor, supporting actress and others.  This is the one people are talking about and the one that other contenders are being judged against.
Cons: Becoming a frontrunner too early can cause a movie to wear out too fast.  Still waiting on a wider release.  Is said to be a very difficult film.  This harsh and real of a look at slavery may be too difficult for voters who are used to a white perspective.

Gravity
Pros: A rare combination of both outstanding box-office and near perfect reviews.  Visual 3D spectacles like this are becoming more successful with voters (i.e. Hugo and Life of Pi).  Not only a major contender for visual effects but also vital categories such as director, original screenplay, actress, sound and score.  Has not faded away like many films already released this year, has a lot of staying power.
Cons: Early release, slight critical backlash, sci-fi does not always do well at The Oscars.  Its main competition is with 12 Years a Slave for a best picture win (for which this is currently the runner up), can't see either of those two missing a best picture nomination.

American Hustle
Pros: David O. Russell's career is in the perfect spot for a Best Picture and Best Director win, having had been nominated for two popular best picture nominees in the past two years.  He is now a regular at the Oscars and this movie stars six recent Oscar winners and nominees.  A throwback to a popular era of cinema, costume pieces like this often do well.  Great late release date that is similar to The Fighter and Silver Linings Playbook.
Cons: Has not been seen yet.  Russell cranked this out very quickly.  Some say it looks too similar too Argo.  May have too late of a start in the race.


The Butler
Pros: One of the year's biggest box-office surprises that is also a hit with most critics.  This movie garnered a lot of attention from the news and was a hit with audiences.  It is the kind of large decade spanning movie based heavily in American history that can do well with the Oscars.  It has enough feel good moments, but also plenty of harsher material that makes the viewers think.  An enormous ensemble lead by two strong actors, one of which is a very powerful media figure.  Should easily get a nomination.
Cons: Won't be a major contender to win.  Early release date.  Some viewers and critics see it as too light weight of material.


Saving Mr. Banks
Pros: Fairly positive reviews and consistent buzz.  Recently the Oscars have loved movies about Hollywood (The Artist, Hugo, Argo, etc.).  It is a loving look at a beloved movie and features two great performances.
Cons: Disney has not had live-action best picture contender in decades (haven't had one nominated under the Disney brand since Mary Poppins in 1964).  Some reviews have not been too kind.  May be mismarketed as it is not as uplifting as the trailers suggest.


Nebraska
Pros: Alexander Payne is one that many feel will earn an Oscar someday and he often fits comfortably in the Oscar race.  This has been a movie he has been wanting to make for years and it has been receiving great reviews from festivals.  A smaller, personal movie that could do well against the larger contenders.
Cons: But then again it may be too small and easily overlooked.  The actors aren't Oscar standards.  May just not be Payne's year.  Needs to earn notices with precursors.


Captain Phillips
Pros: Has great box-office and reviews going for it. Hanks still holds a lot of weight and this is his first project in a long time to be a viable candidate.  Stories based on recent events can get nominated when done well.
Cons: Needs to maintain its buzz now that it has been released.  Hanks may put more attention towards the more Oscar friendly Saving Mr. Banks.  Could be too much of an action movie.


Fruitvale Station
Pros: In the past several years early releases have really surprised in this category (Hurt Locker, Winter's Bone, Kids are All Right, Tree of Life, Midnight in Paris, Beasts of the Southern Wild, etc.).  This is the one that has people taking and near perfect reviews.  If the studio gives it a proper push in December it will make its way to a very deserved nomination.  Especially if more new movies continue to drop out of the race, this has remained consistent and pretty resilient.
Cons: Early releases are still risky.  Has an uphill battle in key categories of director, original screenplay, actor and supporting actress.  The movie may be too small and feature too much of an unknown cast and director to get noticed.


Wolf of Wall Street
Pros: Scorsese is a still a legend who received another nomination only two years ago.  Based on a popular book and features a very Oscar friendly cast.  Now that other movies have dropped out of the race and this is confirmed for 2013 it should have a decent shot at a nom.
Cons: Despite how much they may seem like Oscar bait, Leo's projects have been striking out a fair amount.  May be too different from what voters want from Scorsese.  Movies about money have not been large critical successes.  Also the well publicized attempts to move it 2014 has caused it to lose some momentum.  There is a chance that this shorter cut of the film may be inferior.


Inside Llewyn Davis
Pros: People always predict the Coens and they have had a great track record since their win for No Country for Old Men, with two additional best picture nominees.  Great reviews from the festival circuits and many pundits are swearing by this movie.
Cons: Seems very low-key and understated, said to be a downer.  This does not strike me as an Oscar movie.  If it does not gain attention in other categories (namely directing, acting and writing) it will easily get overlooked.  This one in particular needs precursors.


Runner-Ups
Her
Pros: A unique premise that is very relatable to modern society.  A great cast and good reviews out of New York Film Festival.  Will definitely stand out.
Cons: May be too strange.  Spike Jonze was only nominated for his first film in 1999.  May not work with celebrities who may not feel that reliance on technology to overcome isolation.


All is Lost
Pros: Great reviews and a lot of good feeling towards the veteran Redford.  With the great reception towards The Artist voters are definitely more open to nonconventional movies like this.
Cons: A very small movie that may not make an impact in its release.  Similar in theme to Gravity.  It's best picture potential is dependent on how popular of a nominee Redford is.


Blue Jasmine
Pros: Terrific reviews and box-office.  Woody Allen is still a name easily associated with Oscars and many say Blanchett is the frontrunner for best actress.
Cons: Early release and buzz has certainly died down.  Needs Blanchett to be a sure thing and strong nominee as well as a few more nominees to drop out.  Woody is pretty inconsistent at the Oscars, even when his films are great (i.e. Match Point, Vicky Cristina Barcelona).


Labor Day
Pros: Retiman has directed two best picture nominees.  He steps outside of his comfort zone for this difficult film.  Could be divisive in a good way.
Cons: May be too divisive.  Has not even received a trailer, could be pushed back or swept under the rug.


Book Thief
Pros: Sole World War II movie this year
Cons: Late entry, not much known about it, not up for too many other nominations.


Also in Contention

With three potential acting nominees and a socially relevant subject matter Dallas Buyers Club could get a best picture nomination.  There is a lot of good reviews for Blue is the Warmest Color, it could pull an Amour and controversy could help it gain attention.  However controversy may also limit it to foreign language.  There are several early releases with incredibly positive reception that could reenter the race, namely Mud and Before Midnight.  Lone Survivor is also an unseen contender that could potentially surprise.