Showing posts with label Oscar Snubs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oscar Snubs. Show all posts

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Why They Weren't Nominated

Taking a look at the movies and people who missed out on nominations.  Not snubs per say, because this post is not about what should have been nominated or movies that I liked more than others.  This is just analyzing some contenders that had Oscar potential and missed out this year.

You can also check out my predictions from last week, I was pretty accurate only missing one or two nominations in m major category.

            
The big upsets for Best Picture were Philomena and Dallas Buyers Club.  Both were late releases and fresher in people's minds.  Philomena was just the type of good movie that people latched on to and supported, despite its lesser amount of box-office or precursor nominations.  Its screenplay most likely helped it out too.  Dallas Buyers Club has two very strong acting nominations which brought it quite a bit of attention.  Its screenplay and editing nomination shows that it was a movie that hit with voters.  Probably a combination of release date, star power, being related to a real issue and campaigning.

The big exclusion was Saving Mr. Banks.  A lot of that may be Disney's inexperience in campaigning, very few movies from Disney or Touchstone have ever received a best picture nomination.  This also did not have a strong enough reception, it is doubtful that many voters placed it at number one.  The lack of a directing contender hurt it too.  But also, as evidenced by Meryl Streep's accusations against Walt Disney last week, Walt is a polarizing figure that people easily latch onto inaccurate rumors about.  The movie did not convince people of the truth and that definitely had a factor in it missing out on best picture, actress, supporting actor, original screenplay and editing.

I probably overestimated Fruitvale Station's chances, but it seemed like the most likely early release.  Early releases did not do well this year, which may be do to none of them receiving astonishing reviews or box-office and the Oscar season being exceptionally strong.  The movie just got forgotten about.  As did The Butler, which had all of the right ingredients for the Oscars but there was enough persistent controversy to keep it down and it may have been released too early.  Also the awkward official title may have something to do with it.  I am still placing the blame for the general absence of Inside Llewyn Davis on CBS Films as a weak, inexperienced distributor.  The movie was also very small among a year of very big films and it just did not stand out enough.

       
My directing predictions were spot on.  Her was not strong enough to get Spike Jonze attention for his direction.  Paul Greengrass certainly had a decent chance after his DGA nomination, but Captain Phillips was not as strong of a contender as many felt.  Ryan Coogler, Lee Daniels and others were not getting in without best picture nominations.

Leonardo DiCaprio made it in, showing that Wolf of Wall Street is a stronger contender this year.  He has been considered snubbed before, which helps.  This is also a career best performance, his role in Great Gatsby helped bring him more attention this year too.  Also Christian Bale was able to ride the hype of American Hustle to a nomination.  His weight gain probably helped.  Both of these performances are broader and flashier than many of the more understated snubs, they were probably just easier to recognize.

The big exclusion was Robert Redford, which was a possibility after missing with SAG.  His film was too small and for whatever reason he has never done well with acting at the Oscars.  Bruce Dern most likely took his veteran slot.  Captain Phillips must have not had enough support, because it missed out in this category too.  The earlier release and potential vote splits with Saving Mr. Banks cost Tom Hanks here.  With The Butler not doing well with voters Forest Whitaker missed out, even with a SAG nomination.  This was a year for established players leaving Michael B. Jordan and Oscar Isaac without much of a chance.  Joaquin Phoenix just did not receive enough attention for Her to be a major contender.

    
This category was always focused on six actresses.  There was little room for other actresses, most notably Adele Exarchopoulos, Brie Larson and Julie Delpy.  Many pundits had left off Amy Adams, but she is too well liked and had too flashy of a role in one of the year's biggest contenders.  I expected that after Meryl Streep won a third Oscar and August: Osage County was poorly received that she would be the one left out.  But the actress is absolutely revered and she had a showy role in an Oscar type movie.  Voters seem to just default to her.

The big snub was Emma Thompson for Saving Mr. Banks.  She is much less popular of an actress than the other nominees which probably factored.  Also her character may have just come across as too unlikable.  But the movie's lack of nominations shows that it just did not work for voters, because it did not get any notable awards and that unfortunately hurt her chances.

               
This was the toughest category to figure out as Jared Leto and Michael Fassbender were the only sure things.  But the voter's love of American Hustle and the likability of Bradley Cooper earned him a nomination many did not think he would receive.  Barkhad Abdi was an unknown actor that just had the right movie and role for him to breakthrough with awards attention.  The amount of fairly consistent precursor nomination most likely put him on voter's radar and definitely paid off for him.  The big surprise however was Jonah Hill who rode the apparent good will for Wolf of Wall Street and has been making good enough career choices to be nominated a second time.

Daniel Bruhl received key precursor notice, but Rush did not and the movie was pretty much shut out. Again, Saving Mr. Banks did not click with voters and Tom Hanks was never the major contender many though he would be for this role.  Posthumous nominations are rare and Enough Said did not get on the voter's radar enough for James Gandolfini to get a nomination.  The buzz about Nebraska being focused on Bruce Dern seems to have harmed Will Forte.  His performance was likely too subtle for this category and he just never quite clicked with precursors for whatever reason.


            
Sally Hawkins was a surprise for Blue Jasmine, which the movie must have been received well enough because she got in in addition to the screenplay.  Jennifer Lawrence was not a sure thing, but American Hustle is just that strong of a nominee to carry four of its actors.  Her career and popularity and buzz about this being a scene stealing revelation also helped.  June Squibb stood out enough as a memorable character in Nebraska.  Julia Roberts and Lupita Nyong'o were locks.

But Oprah was also a lock.  The only main precursor she really missed was the Globes, which is not the most accurate predictor.  It is She may have peaked too early and her return to the screen just ended up being forgotten.  This is the oddest omission, because it is difficult to figure out why she was not nominated.  There must have just been a problem with campaigning The Butler, because the Oscars shut it out.  Also shut out is Fruitvale Station.  Octavia Spencer had too small of a role in a forgotten film and her precursor season did not go far past her National Board of Review win.

Frozen and The Wind Rises were locks and are the two contenders to win animated feature.  The Croods made enough money and was good enough to get a nomination.  Ernest and Celestine played well with the animation industry and GKids has been very good at campaigning small foreign, hand drawn films.  The type of movies that the Oscars should help out.  The surprise animated feature nominee was Despicable Me 2, the first nomination for Illumination Animation.  The incredible box-office most likely was the main factor, but there is a chance that voters are obsessed with irritating little yellow idiots that speak oddly like everyone else seems to be.

The movie that was shockingly left out was Monsters University.  Pixar missed out for Cars 2, but that movie was not good.  The expectation for this to be bad probably factored into it.  People seem to have a backlash for Pixar doing sequels (or in this case prequels) and expect them to be bad.  They were most likely not viewing Monsters as its own movie, but did not like it because it did not feel like a Pixar movie.  However reception was not overly incredible and the movie has not been for everyone.

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Animated Feature Snubs

In 2001 the Oscars added the category of Best Animated Feature.  Since then the number of animated movies has increased and for the most part so has the quality.  Here is my list of ten good animated features that should have received an Oscar nomination or at the very least, consideration.  There are plenty of other animated films I could have chosen (even though Home on the Range and Polar Express are not the best they are both superior to the nominated Shark Tale).  There have been animated movies I have not seen yet, such as SpongeBob SquarePants that may also deserve mention.  I am only listing American animated movies, because there are so many great foreign animated movies every year that do not receive any attention.  These are not all perfect film, but they all have quality and ambition that is on par with many of the films that have been nominated or won.

Atlantis: The Lost Empire (Walt Disney Feature Animation, 2001)
What it Was Up Against: Pixar's Monsters, Inc., Nickelodeon's Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius, and the winner Dreamworks' Shrek
Why it Should Have Been Nominated: Sure there are definite story issues and the characters do not all fit together well, but this is still a good, ambitious movie.  The visual style arresting, the combination of traditional animation and CG still holds up and there is an incredible score.  There is great work on the characters by the animators and voice actors, especially on Dr. Sweet and Helga.  The beautiful scene where Kida becomes part of the crystal alone is enough to earn this a nomination.  Great animation and experimentation in expanding the audience of an animated feature.
What Feature Took Its Nomination: Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius, fun little movie but definitely shows its cheapness and not in the same artistic league.
Why It Wasn't Nominated: Disney was not viewed in the best light in 2001, despite the quality and the risks they took they were held under a lot of scrutiny.  Traditional animation overall was on its way out, the industry assumed that computer animation was superior and did not support its 2D efforts.  The first year of this category coincided with attitudes changing to a CG exclusive mindset, they were not going to nominated a 2D movie.


Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas (Dreamworks Animation, 2003)
What it Was Up Against: Disney's Brother Bear, the French film The Triplets of Bellville and the winner Pixar's Finding Nemo
Why it Should Have Been Nominated: Just a large scale adventure that is well animated with a lot of creativity in the fantasy aspects.  Definitely unlike any other feature.  There are problems, namely from trying to appeal to too many demographics, but this is still a fun movie with great animation.
What Feature Took Its Nomination: Tough call as I have yet to see Triplets of Bellville.  I would say it is on par with Brother Bear, but I personally enjoyed both of those movies more than Finding Nemo.  I was 12 in 2003 and was rooting for Brother Bear to win and was disappointed that this fun movie was not nominated.


Looney Tunes: Back in Action (Warner Bros., 2003)
What it Was Up Against: Disney's Brother Bear, the French film The Triplets of Bellville and the winner Pixar's Finding Nemo
Why it Should Have Been Nominated: The best feature to star the legendary Looney Tunes.  While not on par with the best shorts this is a worthy addition to the characters' legacy.  The humor riffs on everybody, including Warner Bros. itself with some very clever jokes.  The animation is great and fits perfectly in the live-action settings, the best live-action/animation combination film (that does not try to be a live-action movie) since Roger Rabbit.
What Feature Took Its Nomination: To this day I still easily prefer this movie to Finding Nemo.  Complain in the comments section.


Curious George (Universal, 2006)
What it Was Up Against: Pixar's Cars, ImageMovers' Monster House and the winner Warner Bros.' Happy Feet
Why it Should Have Been Nominated: A movie for young children that is entertaining enough for any age.  Great characterization and loving animation.  It knows exactly what it is and does not force anything else.  Really underrated and too little seen.
What Feature Took Its Nomination: The only other movie I really liked from this year was Monster House (which I was rooting to win).  This could have easily taken the place of Happy Feet.


The Simpsons Movie (20th Century Fox, 2007)
What it Was Up Against: The French film Persepolis, Sony Picture Animation's Surf's Up and the winner Pixar's Ratatouille
Why it Should Have Been Nominated: An Oscar would have looked great next to all of those Emmys and Annie Awards.  I have never been a huge Simpsons fan, but this movie is completely accessible to new audiences.  It is funny and a rather touching family story.  It was cinematic without losing the familiar qualities that made The Simpsons great.
What Feature Took Its Nomination: I actually have not seen Persepolis or Surf's Up.  Ratatouille was easily my favorite film of 2007 (I also found some merit within Meet the Robinsons and I will still defend TMNT), but I will assume that The Simpsons Movie was better than Surf's Up (although I am open to watching it).


Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (Sony Pictures Animation, 2009)
What it Was Up Against: Laika's Coraline, Secret of the Kells produced by GKids, Walt Disney Animation Studios' Princess and the Frog, the Wes Anderson directed Fantastic Mr. Fox and the winner Pixar's Up
Why it Should Have Been Nominated: This was a fun movie that was quick with the jokes that were all hilarious.  One of the funniest pure animated comedies in a long time.  The stop-motion style made this unique and the designs are very good.  Works on an emotional level too.
What Feature Took Its Nomination: This was a very tough year.  Even though I loved Up, I still preferred Fantastic Mr. Fox and especially Princess and the Frog.  No qualms with Coraline either, this was easily the strongest lineup in the category's history.  Have not seen Secret of Kells (it is like the third film on my instant queue, so I will get to it).  I will just say that this is a year when six films could have made the cut.


Tangled (Walt Disney Animation Studios, 2010)
What it Was Up Against: The French film The Illusionist, Dreamworks' How to Train Your Dragon and the winner Pixars' Toy Story 3
Why it Should Have Been Nominated: Disney takes what works in traditional animation and applies it magnificently to computer animation.  There is a beauty to this movie and an awe inspiring factor to its use of perspective.  Great characters that are relatable, fun and adventurous.  People love this movie for good reason, it is great.
What Feature Took Its Nomination: I actually have not seen either The Illusionist or How to Train Your Dragon yet (can't believe I have not gotten around to How to Train Your Dragon).  Toy Story 3 was easily my favorite film of 2010, but Tangled was not that far off in quality (different movies with different goals, hard to compare).  I will say that this is a year that should have had five, I am surprised that it didn't.  Although if five were nominated then the overrated Despicable Me would have most likely earned a slot, so it is probably better that there were only three...


Winnie the Pooh (Walt Disney Animation Studios, 2011)
What it Was Up Against: GKids releases Chico and Rita and A Cat in Paris, Dreamworks' Kung Fu Panda 2 and Puss in Boots and the winner ILM's Rango
Why it Should Have Been Nominated: Some of the best working animators put their stamp on these tried and true characters.  This movie is an accurate follow-up to previous Pooh cartoons, but still has its own style.  The script is quick and clever and the songs are terrific.  A movie that is grand in its simplicity and likability.  It does not bombard the audience with humor, but wins them over with its heart and charm.
What Feature Took Its Nomination: This was better than the three American animated films (the other two are in my instant queue).  Deserved to beat Rango.


Arthur Christmas (Aardman, 2011)
What it Was Up Against: GKids releases Chico and Rita and A Cat in ParisDreamworks' Kung Fu Panda 2 and Puss in Boots and the winner ILM's Rango
Why it Should Have Been Nominated: Aardman's created one of the best, most relatable family dynamics I have ever seen in a movie.  This creative premise shows dysfunction in Santa Claus' family.  The animation is creative and characters are well designed.  This was a great script and one of the best movies of the year.

What Feature Took Its Nomination: Have only seen the three American animated features (Chico and Rita and A Cat in Paris are both on my instant queue).  This was easily a better feature than the two Dreamworks movies and the overrated Rango.



Rise of the Guardians (Dreamworks Animation, 2012)
What it Was Up Against: Aardman's The Pirates: A Band of Misfits!, Laika's ParaNorman, the Tim Burton directed Frankenweenie, Walt Disney Animation Studios' Wreck-It Ralph and the winner Pixar's Brave
Why it Should Have Been Nominated: This was one of the big surprises last year.  Dreamworks made an epic, cinematic fantasy with a lot of adventure, heart and appropriate humor.  The stylized characters all work and create a fun ensemble.  It is one of the best blockbusters of 2012, animated or otherwise.  
What Feature Took Its Nomination: Wreck-It Ralph was really the only animated feature that was better than this.  This should have taken the slot of Frankenweenie, The Pirates! and even Brave.