Thursday, January 24, 2013

History of the Disney Animated Feature

Disney has produced 52 fully animated features over the span of 75 years.  It is the longest running, most loved brands in the medium of film.  These movies have ranged in story, audience and style.  It is really fascinating to examine.


The Original Masterpieces (1937-1942)
There is a popular misconception that all Disney animated features are more or less the same.  This is easily disproved by the studio’s earliest efforts: Snow White (1937), Pinocchio (1940), Fantasia (1940), Dumbo (1941) and Bambi (1942).  In these five movies Disney created a traditional fairy tale, an episodic morality tale, an experimental concert, a simple children’s story and a coming of age saga.  The characters are all different, the settings are different and even the target audiences seem different.  While these are all children’s classics that most everybody grew up with they do not pull any punches.  Snow White’s scary woods, the transformation of the queen, the dark implications of Pinocchio’s perils, Dumbo’s separation from his mother and the death of Bambi’s mom remain some of cinema’s most frightening and emotional.  The most remarkable thing about these movies is that they were created by artists who had no experience in feature films.  These were grand experiments that were enormous risks that all paid off.  Part of the reason why these are still some of the best animated features of all time is that these were the one’s that Walt was most passionate about.  He put effort into proving this as a legitimate art form.  Once his ambition was halted and redirected he really never had the same interest or involvement.  In some ways the animated feature never recovered from that.
 
The Package Features (1942-1949)
These are the least known and least popular films in Disney’s catalog.  Due to a focus on war efforts, lack of overseas revenues and an expanding company Disney did not have the time, money or resources to create another Snow White.  Package features, movies made up of several short films, were a necessity.  These do not all work as features, mainly due to lacking the thematic unity of Fantasia.  The first two, Saludos Amigos (1942) and Three Caballeros (1944), were based on a good neighbor trip Disney animators took to South America and featured familiar characters such as Donald and Goofy.  The highlight of the 42 minute long Saludos Amigos was the surreal Aquarela do Brasil, which introduced Donald’s friend, Jose Carioca.  Donald and Jose returned in the even more surreal Three Caballeros, which does not work as a movie but features inspired animated sequences, particularly Ward Kimball’s unrestrained animation of the titular song.  These two cost-effective features were followed by Make Mine Music (1946), Fun and Fancy Free (1947) and Melody Time (1948).  All of these feature great animated shorts such as Willie the Operatic Whale, Mickey and the Beanstalk, Bumble Boogie and Blame it on the Samba.  The final package feature is their best, The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad, which is composed of two feature quality shorts.  These movies do not hold up well today, they were a product of their time.  However they added some great animation to Disney’s catalog which they were able to reuse to greater effect on television and home video.
 
A Return to Form (1950-1955)
Disney started out returning to full-length feature films with a guaranteed success, Cinderella (1950).  The movie is well told and is the definitive on screen adaptation of the prolific fairy tale.  The movie lacks the ambition of the original five animated features, but it is full of heart and quality animation.  The next movie, Alice in Wonderland (1951) was not received as well by critics, audiences, or even Walt himself.  Alice is a very flawed film, it is not well paced and the main character needed work.  But despite being considered something of a failure in the fifties it remains of the most popular Disney films.  The memorable, colorful supporting cast has worked their way into pop culture and people’s hearts.  This was followed with the much more successful Peter Pan (1953) which features the fun side characters and diversions of Cinderella and Alice, as well as a relatable character arc.  Wendy is the best main character since Bambi and Captain Hook was the first Disney villain to really steal the show.  These three retellings of familiar fairy tales became iconic, but Lady and the Tramp (1955) was a modern story that was set in the real world but from a different perspective.  Lady and the Tramp is vastly different from Disney’s grand fantasies as it is really a romantic comedy.  The movie was focused on a relationship, which has become one of the best-loved onscreen romances.
 
Animation as a Secondary Priority (1955-1967)
Walt’s ambition never stopped.  But as he moved into other ventures such as live-action, television and Disneyland he was not focused on animation anymore.  He was working on newer mediums that he hadn’t yet perfected.  Animated shorts, which would cease to be produced with regularity in this period, and animated features were no longer top priority for the studio.  This is reflected in their limited, almost sporadic output.  Sleeping Beauty (1959), One Hundred and One Dalmatians (1961), Sword in the Stone (1963), and Jungle Book (1967) are all well made features found audiences, but it is difficult to compare them to Disney’s previous efforts.  That is not to disparage these movies.  There was a lot of ambition behind Sleeping Beauty which is reflected in its beautiful backgrounds and Sword in the Stone is still loved by many.  Jungle Book is like Alice in Wonderland, where it is not held in high regard in the field of animation, but it is one of the most popular and enduring Disney films among general audiences.  The best film of the era was Dalmatians which features the best characterization, writing and interesting visual styles.
 
Without Walt (1967-1984)
When Walt died the whole company suffered.  Animation in particular, which was reaching its lows as a medium, played it extremely safe.  The Artistocats (1970), Robin Hood (1973), The Rescuers (1977), and Fox and the Hound (1981) are among the weakest animated features Disney has produced.  They utilize an overreliance on celebrity personalities and cheap animation tricks.  However these all found huge audiences and have maintained sizable followings ever since.  Part of this may have been the lack of animated features in the seventies.  Part of it may be our culture’s nostalgia towards memories of childhood.  But most of the continued success for these movies is due to animation being fairly critic-proof.  Emotion outweighs reason when dealing with animation.  Audiences root for the likable Duchess and the kittens, Robin Hood is a rousing adventure, Bernard and Bianca are fun and Todd and Copper have a great friendship.  It says a lot that these movies, which are derided by some, are so memorable and well liked.  The best animated feature of this period was Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh (1977), which is a package feature containing three previously released shorts and new transitional sequences.  Disney’s Pooh is clever, features terrific characterization and is just lovable.  This was the start of one of Disney’s most successful franchises and one of the best outings for the character.
 
Transition Period (1984-1988)
Disney had been severely faltering as a company since Walt died.  Their fortunes looked more and more dire.  There was a mass exodus of animators lead by future competitor Don Bluth in 1979 and a plan to buy the company out in 1984.  Animation wise the only product of note was Mickey’s Christmas Carol in 1983.  Things changed when Michael Eisner, Frank Wells and Jeffrey Katzenberg took over and Roy E. Disney returned to his uncle’s empire.    This is chronicled well in the excellent documentary Waking Sleeping Beauty (available for purchase on iTunes, a must for fans of Disney).  The new regime inherited The Black Cauldron (1985).  It started out as a passion project for a new batch of animators but proved to be troublesome.  The film cost a lot of time and money and became something of a shame to the studio.  There is certainly ambition behind The Black Cauldron and it is admirable that they are trying something darker that was fairly relevant.  However the movie is one of Disney’s worst, it fails to do much interesting.  This was followed with The Great Mouse Detective (1986) and Oliver and Company (1988).  Both of these were immense improvements and helped pioneer the way for computer animation.  However these efforts were both beat out at the box-office by former animator Don Bluth’ An American Tail and Land Before Time.  Serious competition for a Disney animated feature was almost unheard of at the time.
 
Renaissance (1989-1994)
Animation as a medium had been experiencing a gradual renaissance since the early to mid-eighties, by 1989 things had gotten into full swing and really changed for the better.  Disney had entered the renaissance in television and 1988’s Who Framed Roger Rabbit, but their home studio would not have a hit until Little Mermaid (1989).  This movie unexpectedly changed Disney’s fates for the better.  It introduced animation to Broadway style musicals, created marketable characters and had the biggest audiences for an animated feature up until that point.  This was followed by Rescuers Down Under (1990), which was something of a commercial failure and is easily forgotten against the mammoth renaissance hits.  However the Rescuers sequel is a great adventure with some beautiful flying sequences and featured important advancements in computer animation.  The Disney animated musical became the studio’s bread and butter, further solidified by Beauty and the Beast (1991) which connected with both kids and adults and was even nominated for Best Picture at the Academy Awards.  Aladdin (1992) was an even bigger financial success, which was followed by Lion King (1994).  This was the peak of the animation renaissance.  Disney and the field of animation had never experienced a critical and commercial success that huge.  This was the one that people loved and kept coming back to.  Its success set an almost unreachable bar and unfair comparison for Disney’s future features.
 
Post-Renaissance (1995-1999)
Disney would never again reach the success of The Lion King or be the undisputed number one animation studio.  They had proved that animated features was a business to get into and studios such as Pixar and Dreamworks would create competition, that would later mean trouble for the Mouse House.  Throughout the rest of the nineties Disney still had a firm grasp on the animated box-office, but it was obviously not at the same level of the early nineties.  Pocahontas (1995), Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996), Hercules (1997), Mulan (1998) and Tarzan (1999) all continued the musical format and all featured great new songs.  These movies also expanded into mature themes, the problem is that the maturity was offset by a desire to keep these movies targeted to children and marketable.  Having adult themes in the same movie as intrusive funny animal characters that were not involved in the story greatly affected the movie.  Little Mermaid, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin and The Lion King were all accessible to young audiences and enthralling to adults while creating marketable characters and songs that advanced the stories.  These newer movies lacked that.  That is not to disparage these movies, they ought to be commending for trying to move the animated feature in new directions.  These movies must also be credited for their awe-inspiring visuals.  The nature in Pocahontas, scale of Hunchback, stylized design of Hercules, action sequences in Mulan and movement in Tarzan all make use of their unique settings.  Also new in this period was an increased focus on racial diversity and stronger female characters.  This had however backfired in some ways and brought scrutiny to the company.
 
Experimental Phase (1999-2002)
After animating so many musicals and fairy tales the animators tried new things.  Fantasia 2000 (1999) was a sequel to Fantasia.  It is shorter than the original, features almost all narrative shorts and has gags with celebrity hosts.  The shorts are varied but all maintain quality and ambition.  The highlight being the Eric Goldberg segment of Gershwin’s Rhapsody in Blue, styled after Al Hirschfield.  Dinosaur (2000) lacks a quality narrative, but the computer animation juxtaposed in front of real life backgrounds is beautiful.  Emperor’s New Groove (2000) is a buddy comedy with modern day gags that still hold up as hilarious after a decade.  Atlantis: The Lost Empire (2001) has problems in its story, but it is an attempt to expand the Disney animated feature into a new genre for a different audience.  The designs are unique and at times full of wonder.  Then there is Lilo & Stitch (2002), which is an odd juxtaposition of sci-fi tropes, Hawaiian culture, modern day family dynamics, funny animals, the story of the ugly duckling and the songs of Elvis that absolutely work.  Stitch’s funny antics got audiences to the theatre, but the family relationships between Lilo and her sister and the struggle of the naturally chaotic Stitch won them over.  However despite Disney’s efforts to experiment with different types of animated features these were not successful.  Fantasia 2000 was quickly forgotten and New Groove and Atlantis were box-office bombs.  Dinosaur was a hit, but not big enough and that put an end to Disney’s in house computer animated efforts.  Lilo & Stitch was the biggest success the studio had in a long time, but that success was overshadowed by those experienced by Pixar and Dreamworks.  Disney was not rewarded for their risk-taking efforts, they were penalized for it.
 
Falling Out of Favor (2002-2005)
Disney was no longer the only studio producing quality theatrical animation.  Their competition kept increasing.  Audiences were no longer getting excited for Disney’s animated efforts.  After several critical and commercial misfires they became secondary to Pixar and Dreamworks.  Treasure Planet (2002) was another diversion from the traditional Disney feature and a quality effort at that.  But despite all of its strengths it had a costly budget that it did not make back.  This, along with Disney’s other recent failures and the success of other CG movies lead Disney to calling it quits on traditional 2D animation.  Their final two traditional movies, which were already in production were Brother Bear (2003) and Home on the Range (2004).  These were two of the studio’s most forgettable films.  Brother Bear had a gorgeous nature backdrop and was able to hit similar heartstrings to Lilo and Stitch, but the movie was quickly forgotten.  Home on the Range made even less of an impact.  The premise would work as a short film, but there was not enough in this simple story to justify its feature length.  The first CGI movie they came out with was Chicken Little.  It did much better box-office than Disney’s other recent movies but it did not measure up the numbers its competition was bringing in.  It was also a critical failure.  Chicken Little was just another movie in a line of Shrek knock-offs and it had no heart or creative visuals to distinguish itself from the other rip-offs.
Following Pixar (2005-present)
Chicken Little had made money, but Disney animation still needed some help getting back in the public favor.  That started to change when Disney bought out Pixar, whose contract with the Mouse was up and there was fear of losing them to another distributor.  John Lasseter, now in charge of both Pixar and Disney animation, reworked or cancelled movies already in production.  A Day with Wilbur Robinson became Meet the Robinsons (2007) and American Dog became Bolt (2008).  These films were improvements over Chicken Little, Meet the Robinsons earned its way to the heartstrings and Bolt has some great action set pieces and comedic moments.  But these were easily overlooked when compared to Ratatouille or WALL-E, both of which performed vastly better with critics and audiences.  Disney did have finally had a critical and commercial success that felt like a Disney movie with Princess and the Frog (2009).  This was Disney’s return to traditional animation.  However while making money it was still outperformed by the many competing animated films.  Tangled (2010) was the most successful Disney movie since The Lion King and it got people recognizing the studio for the first time in a long time.  Even though Disney is no longer the highest regarded animation studio their output is improving.  The quality animation continued with Winnie the Pooh (2011), another installment of the Pooh franchise which utilizes the style and characterization of Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh while telling its own self-contained story.  However this responsibly budgeted movie, which did break even, was released with little fanfare from the studio who buried it by releasing it on the same day as the final Harry Potter.  They put much more careful marketing behind Wreck-It Ralph (2012) which managed to please audiences of all ages and backgrounds with its relevant setting and clever premise.  Disney is still making the best animated features after 75 years in the business and they show no signs of stopping.  Frozen (2013) has yet to be released.  But Disney seems to hold little clout anymore and are definitely seen by the public as being in the shadows of other animated movies.  Nevertheless the longevity of this magical studio continues to amaze and delight. 

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Best Versions of the X-Men

The X-Men have received several great adaptations.  There have been three great X-Men cartoons, three great X-Men movies and one movie that is not as good as the other three but still has some good qualities.  Even Pryde of the X-Men isn't bad for a late eighties pilot and the recent X-Men anime is a decent adaptation.  The interesting thing is that while the general story and message remains throughout all interpretations the characters are different in each adaptation.  So here is my look at the best version of the main X-Men characters.

Professor X
Charles Xavier has fared better in movies and television than most comic book characters.  I would even say he is a better character on screen than in the comics as he is much more sympathetic and less of a burden.  X-Men: The Animated Series found a good balance in using him.  He was not always necessary, but he was still capable of going on adventures.  I also like the weird voice he has in the nineties' cartoon, makes him sound slightly villainous.  Patrick Stewart was a perfect choice to portray him in the movies.  Stewart's commanding presence, strong voice and good humor anchored the movies and certainly narrated them well.  In X-Men: Evolution he is much more of a father figure and teacher.  Again here he serves as somewhat of an anchor and straight man for the young mutants making mistakes.  Wolverine and the X-Men came up with a genius excuse to get the Professor out of the mansion while still using his deus ex machina powers by having him transported to the future while occasionally communicating in the present.  Xavier in the future had a few adventures of his own and became a revolutionary leader for oppressed mutants.  James MacAvoy played a young version of Stewart's Xavier.  MacAvoy was consistent with Stewart's portrayal but added some youthful recklessness.  This version of Xavier is the one that did not know everything and was still learning how the world worked.

Best Xavier: This is a tough one, because they are really all good in their own ways but I have to give it to Patrick Stewart who really defined the character, specifically in X-Men where he had more to do.  But I do really respect MacAvoy's performance and interpretation.

Cyclops
Scott Summers is a tough character to make work, the comics have pretty much proven that.  On screen Cyke usually tends to be a plot device.  This was the problem with him in the movies, while James Marsden was well cast he has no role outside of guy obsessed with Jean, person Wolverine hates and loosely designated leader.  Wolverine and the X-Men is similar to this, but he doesn't have the leader position. X-Men: The Animated Series is a bit better.  While Cyclops is still mainly defined by his relationships with Jean and Logan he gets his own storylines and there is a strong characterization.  He is the natural leader and straight-laced boyscout.  However X-Men: Evolution really made him the viewpoint character.  He was still the leader that did everything by the book, but he was very much a teenager.  He struggled with his powers, he struggled with girls and having friends.  He questioned everything and would be reckless.  He had an edge to him and would not go easy on the bad guys.  This Cyclops had a character arc and was never boring.

Best Cyclops: X-Men: Evolution, no contest

Iceman
For a character that comic book writers rarely do anything with he has been used a lot on screen.  He was a main character on the favorite Spider-Man and His Amazing Friends.  The series could be corny, but there were good character dynamics and this fun-loving Iceman still holds up.  He had a role in one episode of X-Men: The Animated Series which had an interesting take on him as kind of a cross between Wolverine and Jubilee.  He was the kid of the original team, but he definitely had a temper and was more hardcore than the others.  X-Men: Evolution had him as a junior member who is carefree and kind of a burden, but dependable.  Wolverine and the X-Men puts him on the main team where he is slight comic relief.  Shawn Ashmore plays a great Bobby Drake in the movies, especially in X2, the "coming out" scene is one of the franchises best.  He gives on of the better performances in those movies.

 Best Iceman: This is a tough one, because I like them all.  He was my favorite character in Spider-Man and His Amazing Friends, which is one of my favorite cartoons and I really loved Shawn Ashmore.  However X-Men: The Animated Series provides the most interesting take on Iceman.  It is unlike anything in the comics, but is still completely in character.  The episode Cold Comfort plays up on some overlooked qualities of the character, namely his hotheadedness, anger and inability to fit in with the other X-Men.

Angel
Angel is not a character that is easy to use.  In the comics I can't think of anybody besides Rick Remender who really had a solid take on the character.  Despite Ben Foster being a good actor, he was pointless and forgettable in X-Men: The Last Stand.  X-Men: The Animated Series uses his vengeful Archangel persona, but his only seemed to be to remind us that Apocalypse was evil.  He only had a few appearances in X-Men: Evolution, but they made an impact.  Casting him as a mutant who loved using his powers for others.  I liked his minor recurring role in Wolverine and the X-Men, as an ally who helped support the X-Men with his bigoted father's fortune.

Best Angel: Definitely X-Men: Evolution.  His guest episode, On Angel's Wings, is one of the best of the series.  The episode focuses on the wonderment of Warren's powers and the faith he inspires in others.

Beast
Hank McCoy is my favorite superhero and he has been used very well outside of comics.  I was first introduced to the character in X-Men: The Animated Series.  He allows the series to explore more mature themes of hate through his imprisonment arc and the episode Beauty and the Beast.  X-Men: Evolution uses him to be a mentor, but unlike the other three teachers Beast is getting used to his mutation like the students.  Wolverine and the X-Men he is comic relief and is a sounding board for Logan.  He was the best part of X-Men: The Last Stand, casting Kelsey Grammer was brilliant as he has perfected mixing humor and intelligence.  I was not a fan of Nicholas Hoult in X-Men: First Class. His character arc was just not that interesting and it did not seem consistent with X-Men: The Last Stand.

Best Best: I know everybody else hates the movie, but X-Men: The Last Stand completely got the character of Hank McCoy right.  A good natured, caring man who is civic minded but struggles with his unfortunate physical mutations.  He was great in the action scenes and the makeup looked great.  Kelsey Grammer gives one of the best interpretations of my favorite character.

Jean Grey
Jean is a lot like Cyclops, she is often just used to make Wolverine more interesting.  She had the least to do on X-Men: The Animated Series and the worst costume on the team.  But this version had a certain gentleness that is appealing.  Jean was absent through most of Wolverine and the X-Men and was essentially a reason for Cyclops to brood.  Famke Jansen is a great actress and does a great job in the movies.  It is easy to see how people are attracted to her as she plays her likable and intelligent.  It is pretty cool to see her as Phoenix too, even if they did not tell that story as well as they could.  X-Men: Evolution uses her as a main character.  A popular girl with some depth to her.  She struggles to be perfect and mature while struggling with her powers.

Best Jean Grey: Again, X-Men: Evolution was really spot on with its characterization.  It was the only time on screen or in the comics that Jean Grey was her own character.

Nightcrawler
Nightcrawler has a lot of different sides to his personalities.  His onscreen appearances utilized all of these in different ways.  His religion was highlighted on X-Men: The Animated Series and he guest starred in one of the series' best episode (a kid's show that actually uses religion).  He was religious in X2 as well, as played by Alan Cumming.  But his brooding side and hate toward his mutation was the main focus.  X-Men: Evolution also used the struggle with his physical mutation, but he was also the fun-loving, comic relief.  His swashbuckling, adventure persona surfaced in Wolverine and the X-Men.

Best Nightcrawler: As much as I loved his episode on the 90's cartoon, I am going to give it do Alan Cumming in X2.  The religious side is present and he has some of the best jokes of the movie, but Cumming really portrays a remorse that is quite tragic.  Also the intro of him invading the White House is awesome.

Wolverine
This is the main character of any X-Men story in the comics or onscreen.  He is the one people have a fascination with and takes a majority of the focus.  The only time he was not the lead was in X-Men: Evolution.  I have read criticism that the character was too soft, but his harsh instructor was the funniest character on the series.  Also his orange costume is one of my favorites.  X-Men: The Animated Series is how a lot of us were introduced to him and that is still the voice I think a lot of us associate with the character.  His leadership role in Wolverine and the X-Men was a different take on the character that worked.  Of course he was also portrayed by Hugh Jackman in the movies.
Best Wolverine: I do think that Wolverine in the '90s cartoon is iconic, but you can't understate Hugh Jackman's interpretation.  There have been few comic book characters that have been as symbionic with their actor as Hugh and Logan.  X2 is the best outing of the live-action character, but his cameo in First Class was a very pleasant surprise.

Storm
For one of the most well-known X-Men Storm really has not had that many good appearances.  X-Men: The Animated Series she was in a majority of the episodes but those long winded speeches did get annoying.  She was decent for her small role in X-Men: Evolution, but the character never expanded past aunt or mentor.  Wolverine and the X-Men really has nothing for her to do.  I do like Halle Berry as an actress, but she really was one of the more forgettable members of the ensemble.  The Last Stand for its many problems actually seemed to improve on Storm from the first two.

Best Storm: X-Men: The Animated Series is the one that is iconic.  Best costume for Storm and interesting characterization of her.  Really the only time there was something for her to do.

Rogue
Rogue matters in her onscreen appearances much more than she usually does in the comics.  Was one of the main mutants in X-Men: The Animated Series where she added a nice energy to the team dynamic.  X-Men: Evolution had a completely different take with her as a troubled goth.  This interpretation worked for me, it brought a focus to the tragedy of her powers.  Rogue in Wolverine and the X-Men did not work for me.  Her troubled youth persona in that series seemed forced and very false.  Anna Paquin did a great job in the movies, also focusing on the tragedy of her powers.  The character played off of Wolverine very well and made a great focal point.

Best Rogue: I really liked Anna Paquin's Rogue, but she became pretty inconsequential after the first movie.  And while I liked her a lot in Evolution, she was a stand-out in X-Men: The Animated Series.  Don't think the show would have worked without her, certainly wouldn't have been as fun.

Magneto
Magneto has been awesome in every onscreen appearance.  I think that is because he is the character that really best represents the X-Men, if you don't get him right you don't get the story right.  He was great on X-Men: The Animated Series where he did villainous actions but definitely showed remorse and caring.  In X-Men: Evolution he was downright scary, this was Magneto without a sensitive side.  One who would use kids, put away his daughter and later brainwash her.  Wolverine and the X-Men had a Magneto that cared about mutants and worked to give them utopia.  However he was not above doing anything to maintain that goal and almost caused the end of the world.  Ian McKellen of course gave what many would consider an definitive portrayal.  He was eloquent, cunning and charming while being a believable antagonist.  He really captured the character's three-dimensional qualities.  Michael Fassbender expanded on McKellen's revered work in First Class making him even more sympathetic and more terrifying.

Best Magneto: This is a tough one because they all fit their individual stories so perfectly, but I am going with Michael Fassbender.  He was the highlight of X-Men: First Class and really made the movie about Magneto's harsh origins.  McKellen is of course always great, but Fassbender really did some new things with the character.